Saturday, June 19, 2010

Oil Spill Prospects - Comparing to Past Well Blowouts

If the biggest problem in all of this is that the blowout preventers (BOPs) blew out, then we should probably look at similar instances. The well is a blowout or gusher, and the oil pours and pours until it is capped, the well is destroyed or all the oil comes out. This isn't a one off spill and it isn't going to solve itself. As a result we're looking at mostly very old cases, mostly before BOPs were first created (in 1924). First, lets look at the characteristics of the current situation at the Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico.

The major estimates range between the low White House Department of Energy estimate at: 33k barrels (via Stephen Chu), the high DOE estimate at 57k barrels, and 100k barrels from Matthew Simmons (Oil and gas investment banker). It sounds as though there is a decent possibility it's greater than 100k, and this may be the maximum flow from the well. The well was also estimated to contain about 50m bbl. Extremely simplistically, the highest estimates can be extrapolated to 500 days of oil flow.

This all started on April 20th, now it's June 19th. So we're 60 days in. Worst case scenario, we're about 12% of the way through this. To further the point (and show how this isn't as ridiculous as it sounds), we can use a comparison.

This takes us back a century to the Lakeview Gusher. Three characteristics make it stand out: 1. it couldn't be stopped, 2. it was been estimated to have released about 90k barrels per day at its peak, 3. it was also from within a similar order of magnitude (it eventually spewed about 10m bbl and didn't continue to produce much more when the original bore was closed and the field redrilled), 4. this well spewed a river of oil for 540 days. In other words, this isn't completely insane.

BP claims it is collecting up to 25,290 barrels a day between the cap on the pipe and a new containment system. If this is the case (requiring us to trust BP), then between the lowest and highest acceptable estimates, they are recovering between 25 and 76% of the oil, and still leaves between 8k and 75k barrels being released into the GOM per day. To put this in perspective once again.

The Exxon Valdez checked in at 272k barrels of oil in total. If we allow for the currently claimed capture, this leaves us with an Exxon Valdez every 4-30 days. Today, we would be in the areas around Valdez 5, and Valdez 20. If the flow rate is the low Chu less the capture (8k per day * 45 days), or the very best case scenario, we have 360k bbl to go, or about 1.3 Valdezs to go if the relief wells are done by mid-August. If it is the Simmons (still allowing for BPs capture rate), we about have another dozen Valdezs to go.

If the relief wells don't work, we have only the option of nuking it, or letting it run out. If we let it run out, and we assume that as much oil that came out of Lakeview (10m bbl) can come out of this one (and this well is 5x larger), we still have another 27.5 Valdezs on our hands if the capture rate is what BP claims (and it doesn't change).

Tomorrow, hopefully some visualizations and publishing some numbers. Also, I'd like to look at the nuclear options. I just took a quick look through, and it sounds like there are most certainly risks. This is a trade, not a solution, on both sides.

My expectation as of right now: for political reasons, we wait to see if BP can drill in to make the relief well. If this doesn't happen by the end of August, we will nuke the well.

Nightly Reads

What I found interesting today:


Marcelo Garcia and a chess champ put together Marcelo's online grappling service: the site itself is MGinAction (It's good)

Seeing as to me being a hater when it comes to politics, I found this refreshing: (msnbc)

Here's a bit of reposting a quick takedown by Yves Smith of nakedcapitalism:

Obama’s Twist of BP’s Arm Stirs Debate on Common Tactic New York Times. OMG, the Grey Lady is simply troweling out the Team Obama PR. Go back to the Roosevelts, either Teddy or FDR, to see what taking on the corporate power structure really looks like. And Johnson and Nixon kept them in line through means less visible to the public, such as J. Edgar Hoover’s famed dossiers on prominent individuals, including CEOs (of course, in our total surveillance society, one can only imagine what information the powers that be can gather now, but . Companies did not DREAM of negotiating with government on an equal footing, which as Richard Kline pointed out, is exactly what happened with BP.
An Inside Oil and Gas Engineer's Take on the BP spill



Books Currently Reading:
Reminiscences of a Stock Market Operator by Edwin Lefevre (Jesse Livermore)
Econned by Yves Smith
The Concept of Anxiety by Soren Kierkegaard

Books Recently Purchased:
13 Bankers by Simon Johnson
The Fighters Mind by Sam Sheridan


To cover tomorrow:
BP Spill to Day 60 (More on forecasts of this tomorrow - just to note, I'm going to take some of the other references I've heard of, and just go with it. Not at all an expert, just going to throw some numbers out there)
Jiu jitsu game: going to talk about different positions and how I'm currently breaking things down. Getting the notes out.


First Post

I'm looking to do this blog just to keep the thoughts organized and keep good track of the things I do. I'm generally going to focus on (in no particular order):
  • Finance/Quantitative Analysis
  • Brazilian Jiu Jitsu/Grappling
  • Politics/Political Economy
  • Music
  • Whatever other random shit is at least kind of interesting
I'll try to keep the posts to either be in one of these five categories. As of right now, I'll probably make most of my posts on these topics as these are actually places of study. Work/business/life is the application of these studies into the real world plus the dynamics of bullshitting. I'll probably have a fair amount of posts on those very thoughts in particular. So I guess the above categories will be for things that I can easily figure into technical truths, or of empirical relevance. The work/business/life/bullshit can be for theoretical forays (or simply why this blog will exist). Answers in those posts may appear fleeting. Good luck reading.